Friday 8 May 2015

36 The patience of Job


In Africa, life moves at a slower pace, towards an ironically shorter end. Planned change, if it happens at all, happens in African time, which begins tomorrow, and then takes a break for a while. It is almost a sign of weakness to pitch up to a meeting on time in Africa, and it is certainly a sign of naivety, (unless there are free sandwiches), as no one else will be there.

Even African leaders are calling for Africans to set their body clocks to today:


In rural Tanzania, then, those planning long-term, sustainable change need not just all the other positive attributes of change agents, but also the patience of Job.

(The ‘Patience of Job’, as you probably know, refers to the proverbial patience of a Biblical figure who lived, it seems, soon after Abraham.



He lost everything he had, including all his wealth, camels, sheep, donkeys, and friends – and even his children, who all died. Then, when he had patiently proved his submission to God, he was rewarded with twice as much wealth, and twice as many camels, sheep, donkeys, and friends. And also ten replacement children – these were the days before University tuition fees.)

Anyway, even Job would have raised an intolerant eyebrow at the vicissitudes of the women of rural Africa. Not dying in childbirth surely should have been an urgent need for endless generations. African women have been far too patient.




Even if Job were getting restless for action, however, it does not imply that the alternative way ahead should therefore be given over entirely to impatience.

I say this despite being something of an expert on impatience. Surgeons are naturally impatient, but I have taken it to new levels, and indeed have invented several forms of impatience previously unknown to mankind. There cannot be many people, for instance, who never listen to the BBC news on the radio, because it is unbearable to waste 6 beeps of their life waiting for it to start.

(My wife, by contrast, is very, very patient. Very patient. When we first met, she used to slow the car as she approached green traffic lights, so as to be ready in case they turned red. Commendably safe, I am sure, but only love, deep respect, and lack of dual controls and a cricket bat stopped me from taking command. Safety is not everything. I eventually brought her round by making her morning cup of tea with cold bathwater in case I scalded myself.)

Anyway, here is the paradox: When things go naturally slowly, impatience can be a useful and necessary driver to kick-start some action: getting a caesarean done quickly, for instance, in a culture where people traditionally meander to the theatre when they are ready. However, impatience is a blunt instrument. Getting things to happen quickly, and getting angry when they don’t, is likely to produce a quick-fix solution – or drive you to an early grave without yielding a benefit.

(The early-grave danger is a particular worry, given the paroxysmal wrath induced in me by automated phone-answering systems:

“Hi! My name is Emma. Welcome to the Public Toilet Opening Times Enquiry Service.
With my initially soothing but eventually apoplexy-inducing voice, I am going to guide you through the options, at the same time as liberally sprinkling my patronising pronouncement with infuriatingly facile irrelevancies.

Press 1 if you would like to know the nearest public toilet to your current location. This service can only be accessed by honorary life members, or by adding the access code which you will find on the door of any public toilet.

Press 2 if you would like to know how much time and money you have wasted on our automated phone system, and others like it, over the past year.

Press 3 if you would like to start going round a seemingly endless set of options which eventually by tomorrow lunchtime leads you back to this one.

I’m sorry. I did not understand that.
Please try again, but without hitting your phone needlessly hard, or throwing it against a wall and stamping on the remains.

OK. Using a six-digit number system, please say or enter on your keypad the date of birth of your favourite estate-agent’s best friend.

You seem to be having trouble.
If you have forgotten your security data, you can refresh it now, by logging into
Well done. You are nearly there.
Finally, whilst you are on-line, we need to know that you are not a robot.
Here is a 1x1cm picture of smudged Turkish graffiti on a toilet wall in Istanbul, in a photo taken from the International Space Station. What are the second and fourth letters of the signature?

Press 4 if you have already been incontinent.”




It’s a tricky thing, then, impatience. It is not about efficiency, or getting a job done as best as possible in the time available. It’s not even about making sure that the final result is the one you want. Impatient driving for instance, gets you there no faster, risks not getting you there at all, and annoys everyone, include yourself, in the process.

Impatience, then, is not about passion for excellence. It is simply about being determined that the next five seconds go to plan. Then the next five seconds. And so on. In surgery, that it is almost always good, but in the rest of life, impatience is a hindrance to the smooth flowing of a calm and productive existence.

And so, finally, to the point. (Thank you for your patience.) I went out to Tanzania nearly two years ago, to the remote villages around Berega:



I came back pumped up with impatient determination to help Berega tackle the desperate tragedy of death in childbirth. Out of this was born EMBRACE-Tushikamane.
That project plans to begin by building a platform of women’s groups in the remote rural hamlets, as we now know this to be an important prelude to success.

A year ago, we had already mustered: the money to begin; the partners to help us succeed; the experts in the methodology to advise us; the charitable NGO to house our efforts; the freshly-mapped road plans of the territory; the support of the community and the hospital; the potential recruits as local project leads; three people who regularly read this blog; and even a highly talented PhD researcher to analyse what will happen.

However, much as these achievements might have been immediately gratifying, they are not enough. On kicking off the project, we would have had fulfilling 5 seconds, with many more of them to follow, but, finally, we would have joined the vast list of well-intentioned failures. The reason is this: firstly, we need a system whereby the women of the villages not just keep up the impetus, but spread it to surrounding villages, until it becomes the norm for rural Tanzanian women collectively to take action to tackle the roots of the problems that kill them.

Secondly, we also need successful examples of where the women’s group’s energy and prioritisation has led to sustainable development: better health, better nutrition, better childbirth arrangements, cleaner water, better antenatal care, better family planning, and so on. 

Thirdly, we need individual champions to spread the lessons.



However, for all this to happen, and happen well, our central need is to embed the whole process in Tanzanian people, Tanzanian systems, and Tanzanian ways of doing things. From the training of the project leads and community leaders, through to the coordination of responses, all of this must be integrated into a Tanzanian-led, Tanzania-based system.

To move towards this goal, we have needed the patience of Job – and so have you, when months drift by without anything seeming to change. However, we are getting there. We have identified Ifakara as the epicentre of these developments, and we now have buy-in from two major players, each with a great international reputation for making a difference:


I hope by the next blog to be able to report that we have a Tanzanian project manager working with these Institutions, and a date for the start: of the collaboration, of local staff selection, and of training.

After far too many generations, that will be Job well done.